Relating Stories
•Bio-technology,
solution to food crisis —Minister
• ‘Nigerians are not
weather-wise’— Meteorologist
• IITA launches new rich
farming technique in Nigeria
• FG reaffirms promise on
internet penetration
• Lip service, bane of
our agriculture —Ugwu
• Vaccines for breast cancer,
promising —Study
• Nuggets on Asthma: Day-time
Asthma symptoms
• Cats can trigger Eczema
in infants
• Nugget on Asthma: Asthmatics
are
stigamatised
Cats can trigger Eczema in infants
BABIES with a genetic mutation and a cat at home were more likely to develop
skin condition before age of one, study finds.
Infants who have a certain genetic mutation are more likely to develop eczema
if there is a cat in the home, a new study suggests.
The idea that genetic mutations associated with a disease can be triggered
by environmental exposures is not a new one, the researchers from Denmark
and Great Britain noted.
"It's more of an example of a mechanism that's likely to happen between
genes and the environment. It's sort of proof of a concept, or an idea that's
been around for years," said study author Dr. Hans Bisgaard, of the Danish
Pediatric Asthma Center at the University of Copenhagen. "You can have
a gene for many diseases but never have the disease if you aren't exposed
to triggers."
In the study, infants with the FLG mutation were studied in two groups, a
high-risk group in Denmark and a representative sample in Great Britain. Children
with the mutation were twice as likely to develop eczema during their first
year of life. Those with the mutation and a cat in their home from the time
of their birth had a further increased risk of having eczema. The study was
published in the June issue of PLoS Medicine.
Eczema, or atopic dermatitis, begins in the first year of life for 65 percent
of the people who have the condition, according to the National Institute
of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. About 20 percent of all
infants and children have symptoms.
Bisgaard explained that the study did not determine how exposure to cats triggered
the eczema, but it did demonstrate that the eczema was not an allergic reaction
to cats.
"It's probably too early to tell parents to go out and shoot the cat,"
Bisgaard added, because the finding needs to be replicated. "What is
often misleading is that people try to learn some guidance from every new
scientific research study. I wouldn't take much guidance from this. I would
see it as proof of a concept, the right theory we're working around."
Bisgaard said there are a number of genes that predict asthma and allergies.
In the foreseeable future, it is likely "we will be able to profile a
child for the risk of these diseases."
In addition to the need to confirm the results before condemning cats, other
factors besides the presence of cats need to be considered as potential triggers,
added Dr. Marc Riedl, section head for allergy and immunology at the David
Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. "The
cat ownership or exposure could potentially be a surrogate for something else
that wasn't measured," he said. For example, there could be a fungal
exposure associated with cats, rather than the cats, that sets off the skin
reaction, Riedl explained.
Riedl agreed the importance of the study is that "it once again demonstrates
gene and environmental interactions in a medical condition. This is another
example of how the genetics of an individual convey some susceptibility to
environmental exposures."